Television Impact On On Presidential Elections

I do believe that television has had a confirming impact on presidential elections. In modern times on that point is a need for television for these types of events. The authors mentioned agreed with the concomitant that television has had a positivist impact on presidential elections. One source, Source D, is a chart of the ratings for presidential debates. I believe that television has had a authoritative impact on presidential elections because the land has changed in recent years, the good deal read changed, there is a trust in the deal who atomic number 18 on television, and there is a more honest aspect when individual sees it themselves.I believe that television has been a arbitrary impact for presidential elections because the world has changed into more modern times. Most mass will agree that quite a little today use technology for almost everything, presidential elections are no different. Watching a debate on television rather than all over the radio has mor e of an impact in the fact that watching soulfulness delivering a speech is much different than simply earreach it. When you whoremaster see a person and their actions, you can have a cleanse understanding on whether or not that person is trustworthy.Because of this, there is a more honest aspect when you can observe who is giving a speech over just hearing it or hearing otherwise people talk about it. This is positive because you can make wear out judgments about a person when you see them rather than just hearing them. Television has overly had a positive impact on presidential elections because the people themselves have changed. In his article, Has Television Reshaped Politics? Source A states, The people have once more become the nation, as they have not been since the days when we were small enough each to know his select representative.As we grew, we lost this feeling of direct contacttelevision has now restored it. (Campbell) The unite States have grown exponentia lly in total since its beginning, and because of this one cannot unfeignedly know what came from where when it comes to these issues. The United States has grown in some(prenominal) case big in numbers to not have the technology like television to educate and admit the people to see these debates first hand. This is positive because there are too many people to not have this technology to help. The people also put their trust in people that have power.In his article, Channels of baron The Impact of Television on American Politics, Source E states, Johnson was a great believer in public opinion polls, and he knew that a recent poll had shown that the American people trusted Walter Cronkite more than any other American to tell it the way it is. (Ranney) Because of this, the American people lay their trust in the hands on Cronkite. They trusted him more than they did their president, and because of that electric chair Johnson do the decision to get out of Vietnam and not run for another(prenominal) term as President.President Johnson knew that the American people would listen to Cronkite more than they would him. This made television positive because they could see for a fact what Cronkite had to say. The chart in Source D shows the television ratings for presidential debates. The ratings have had an overall twilight as the years go on. This is because the people tend to change, and the technology is not advanced enough yet for them to be satisfied.As in the above argument, where they needed to see the candidates in order to truly have a cargo deck on what they are saying, they now need a newer way to visualise the candidates in the debates for the people to have a better understanding of them. This is positive because the human race is never truly satisfied and will respect on wanting a better understanding of the things that are eventful to them. In conclusion, television has had a positive impact on presidential elections. It is positive becaus e the people can make better judgments about a person when they watch them, rather than merely hearing them.It is also positive because the population of the United States is too immense for word to get around, the people cannot afford to not have this type of technology. Another reason wherefore it is positive is because the people generally tend to put their trust in people in power, in order to see for a fact what is true. Finally, television is positive for presidential elections because the people will keep proclivity for more ways to have a better understanding of the people they are voting for.