Thursday, March 14, 2019
Agricultural Policy and the European Union :: Political Politics
Agricultural insurance and the European brotherhoodDiscuss the relative merits/demerits of an inelegant polity oriented to charge right rather than one based upon structural reorganisationThe putting green commercialize shall extend to agriculture and trade in agriculturalproducts. Agricultural products means the products of the soil, ofstock-farming and of fisheries and products of first-stage processdirectly related to these products....The operation and development of thecommon market for agricultural products must be accompanied by theestablishment of a common agricultural policy among the Member States (1)From the beginning of the European Union, EU policy has given emphasis tothe agricultural sector. To this end, a Common Agricultural Policy (CAP)was established in 1963. (2) Provisions for this policy were made in the accord of Rome. The aims of this policy were to increase agriculturalproductivity, to ensure a fair quantity of living for the agriculturalcommunity, to stabilise markets and to ensure reasonable prices for theconsumer. (3) This is unusual in the context of the Treaty of Rome whichprovided for free trade and movement of resources. land wasill-adapted for this approach. Protection was given, not only by customsduties, but overly by a variation of agricultural policies. This essay will discuss the merits and demerits of a the pre-1992 CAP with its emphasis onprice clean up, in equation with the post-1992 CAP which was oriented tostructural reform. It cannot be denied that there were merits of the pre-1992 price reformpolicy. There was a bountiful food supply with an increased variety andquantity of food. Farmers yields increased, particularly the largefarmers. Producers were protected from the external market overdue to communitypreference and, therefore, domestic agriculture could develop. There werealso coil offs in food production. Although some of the policies createdgood returns for farmers, the demerits of said policies far outweighed eachadvantages they had. The core-periphery divide was widened, quantity becamemore important than quality and consumers had to pay higher(prenominal) prices.Agricultural practices caused damage to the environment and internationaltrading relations were strained.Until 1993 the EU rarely supported farmers by paying them direct subsidiesfrom the taxpayers. (4) Instead the 30 billion ECU (and often more) wasspent in the buying up of overindulgence commodities at minimum official pricesand was also used to pay subsidies to traders to trade surpluses on thelower-priced world markets. (5) During the 1960s the price system wasdevised. The first problem with price policies is that of fluctuating anddiffering exchange rates. Green Money was the first solution to bedeveloped to counter the problem of differing exchange rates.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment